Debt Elimination Companies

Has anyone worked with Brady Daley (Coury Mediation Services) regarding debt elimination program? Thanks.?

How much would you be willing to pay for the following services on a monthly basis? Talk to a Primary Care Physician anytime 24 hours a day 7 days a week with unlimited access? Identity Theft protection that guarantees their service to you? Debt elimination system that helps you save up to 50% or more of the cost of your Mortgage, Car Loans, Credit Cards, etc.

Free Credit Restoration & Debt Elimination Clients Needed!!? Hi my name is Tavarra. I own my own business by the name of Financial Destination Inc. We do Credit Restoration and Debt Elimination and a host of other services. Credit Restoration and Debt Elimination is two of our most popular Products. We are not a scam. I am a woman of God and I do not scam Gods Children. A Credit Repair Company can not charge you any up-front fees. It;s against the law. Actually our Credit Restoration Product is free. We offer other products with your monthly membership. I am a Product of the Product. I was a Real Estate Investor and I had two foreclosures on my Credit. Credit Trax was able to get one of those foreclosures deleted from my Credit Report. Credit Trax also had 3 Credit Cards Deleted from my Credit Report. 2 BOFA Credit Cards with high balances and 1 Chase Credit Card. If you want proof I will send you a copy of my Credit Report. Documentation beats conversation. please visit my website www.fdimember.com/143169 or Call me (909)331-7213 God Bless

Anybody know anything about debt elimination companies? I am interested in hearing from anyone who has used this service or know anything about them. I am looking into Creditsolutions.com

Where can I find clients and employees for my business? I am a Personal Financial Analyist and am looking to help people plan for the future. I'd like to help with debt elimination, investments, mortgages, etc. I'd also like to set people up with life insurance, and help people plan for retirement. Like the old saying goes "People don't plan to fail, they fail to plan." I'd like to remedy this situation. Where do you think I can find people in my area who would need these services. Also, I have been promoted as an assistant in the Human Resources department, and I'm looking for employees. I'm not looking for just anyone, and I'm afraid that if I put out an advertisment in the paper that I'm going to get a bunch of calls from people that I don't want. How would I go about finding the kind of people I'm looking for, and screening them before the interview?

Remember the view from 2005? Downsizing the Federal Government, Chris Edwards, Cato Institute, 2005. Instead of advocating tax increases in the name of fiscal responsibility, this book focuses on how the bloated federal budget ($2.5 trillion in 2005, or about 20% of gross domestic product) could be reduced if our leaders put their minds to it. Here are some important facts about this budget: State and local government are spending an additional 11% of GDP, so the total cost of government amounts to nearly 1/3 of the economy. 54% of current federal government spending is for “entitlements” (Social Security, Medicare, federal potion of Medicaid, etc.), 39% for discretional spending, and 7% for interest on the debt. Government spending as a % of GDP has grown, importantly due to entitlements: Federal-defense: 1900 – 1.0%; 1950 – 5.7%; 2005 – 4.0% (enough?) Federal-nondefense: 1900 – 1.8%; 1950 – 9.0%; 2005 – 16.0% State/local: 1900 – 5.0%; 1950 – 6.6%; 2005 – 11.0% Assuming rapid growth in entitlements due to retirement of baby boomers and longer human life spans, the Government Accountability Office projects federal expenditures rising to 23% of GDP by 2015, 33% of GDP by 2030, 45% of GDP by 2040. Mr. Edwards argues that many current federal programs are harmful (e.g., import restrictions), unduly beneficial to special interests (agricultural subsidies, corporate welfare), and/or better left to the states (education) or private sector (rail transportation). One special problem is government grants, which are used by the federal government to influence state or local government programs. Some $426 billion in grants were paid in 2005, ranging from $186 billion for the federal share of Medicaid and the $71 billion cost of the Dept. of Education (mostly grants) to “hundreds of more obscure programs that most taxpayers have never heard of.” The result is to encourage overspending for the stated grant purposes, foster federal, state and local bureaucracies to document compliance with federal mandates, and reduce flexibility and innovation at the state level. Another problem is duplication. Different federal programs often have overlapping objectives, resulting in “turf wars” and/or unnecessary costs to ensure coordination. Thus, the GAO has reported 50 different programs for the homeless in eight federal agencies, 23 programs for housing aid in four agencies, 26 programs for food and nutrition aid in six agencies, and 44 programs for employment and training services in nine agencies. If a program is ineffective or obsolete, the typical response is to create additional programs -- without eliminating the existing program. Edwards lists more than 100 programs and agencies as candidates for elimination, with resultant savings of $380 billion per year. He also advocates cost-saving changes to entitlement programs. If all of his recommendations were implemented, the current federal deficit could be converted to a surplus without raising taxes. Instead of downsizing the federal government, why not concentrate on managing its programs better? The answer is that efforts along this line, including the Committee of Economy and Efficiency in Government appointed by Taft in 1910, the Hoover Commissions (under Truman and Eisenhower, respectively), the Grace Commission under Reagan, Gore’s “reinventing government” plan, and Bush’s “management agenda,” have all failed. Government operations continue to be inefficient and in many cases ineffective. The current programs of the federal government are too diverse and complex for Congress to effectively manage them; it would be far better to do a few things well than to do a lot of things ineffectively. Congress has limited incentive to hold down spending because program costs represent benefits to its members (the gravy they seem themselves as responsible for producing). There is no market discipline if government programs fail (unless and until the taxpayers revolt) such as applies for undertakings in the private sector. Is government downsizing possible? Sure, if enough people demand it, but our political leaders typically hear more about how additional money should be spent than they do about how existing programs should be eliminated to save money. Politicians tend to get increasingly hooked on spending during their years in Washington, which is one of the reasons to support term limits.

Do you think Obama will keep his promise of "no pork" by vetoing the spending bill being passed in Congress? Republicans and taxpayer watchdogs are railing against the thousands of earmarks included in the omnibus spending bill that passed the House Thursday and is awaiting a vote in the Senate. Republicans and tax watchdog groups are railing against the thousands of earmarks included in the omnibus spending bill that the House passed Thursday and is awaiting a vote in the Senate. The $1.1 trillion bill includes $447 billion in operating budgets for 10 Cabinet departments. Mixed in are more than 5,000 earmarks totaling $3.9 billion, according to watchdog Taxpayers for Common Sense. Pork-watchers are only just beginning to sort through the earmarks, which typically are goodies set aside for the districts of members of Congress, as the bill tracks toward a final vote. So far, they've uncovered gems ranging from $700,000 for a shrimp fishing project in Maryland to $30,000 for the Woodstock Film Festival Youth Initiative to $200,000 for a visitor's center in a Texas town with a population of about 8,000. "Let's stop the madness," House Republican Leader John Boehner said, before the bill passed without any GOP support. Twenty-eight House Democrats also opposed it. House Minority Whip Eric Cantor, R-Va., wrote to President Obama urging him to veto the bill, and pledging that Republicans would stand by him if he did. Obama in March waved off controversy over a $410 billion spending bill that also was riddled with earmarks, arguing that it represented "last year's business." This time around, Boehner said, the president needs to crack down on the pork under his watch. Republicans, though, have hardly shied away from the earmarks. Sen. Thad Cochran, R-Miss., is pushing $200,000 for the Washington National Opera. Sen. Judd Gregg, a fiscal hawk, is behind a $1 million earmark for renovation at the Portsmouth Music Hall. Taxpayers for Common Sense reports a total of 5,224 earmarks in the 2010 spending bill, which also includes funding for Medicare and Medicaid. Groups like Citizens Against Government Waste, as well as Sen. John McCain's staff, have drawn attention to dozens of items they consider questionable. Here's just a sampling: -- $150,000 for educational programs and exhibitions at the National Building Museum. -- $400,000 for renovation of the Brooklyn Botanical Garden. -- $150,000 for exhibits at the Theodore Roosevelt Inaugural Site Foundation in Buffalo, N.Y. -- $500,000 for Mississippi River exhibits at the National Mississippi River Museum and Aquarium in Dubuque, Iowa. -- $200,000 for the Washington National Opera. -- $30,000 for the Woodstock Film Festival Youth Initiative. -- $2.7 million for the University of Nebraska Medical Center, to support surgical operations in space. -- $200,000 for a visitor's center in Bastrop, Texas. -- $700,000 for a project called, "Shrimp Industry Fishing Effort Research Continuation," at the National Marine Fisheries Service in Silver Spring, Md. -- $292,200 for the elimination of blight in Scranton, Pa. -- $750,000 for exhibits at the World Food Prize Hall of Laureates in Iowa. -- $1.6 million for a tram between the Marshall Flight Center and Huntsville Botanical Garden in Alabama. -- $655,000 for equipment at the Institute for Irritable Bowel Syndrome Research in Los Angeles. Republicans have been on a tear over earmarks and excessive spending over the past week, particularly as Congress prepares to take up a new jobs-creation package and raise the debt ceiling by nearly $2 trillion. Rep. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., and Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga., on Thursday named what they called the 11 most wasteful spending projects considered by Congress so far this year. On Wednesday, four Republican lawmakers demanded an audit of the $787 billion stimulus program following reports of exaggerated or inaccurate accounts of the number of jobs created. McCain, R-Ariz., and Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., on Tuesday released a report on 100 "questionable" stimulus projects worth nearly $7 billion. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12/11/watchdogs-foul-thousands-earmarks-spending/

What is a good idea for a degree;anyone with knowledge about our economy care to help me with this investment? I am almost ready to get a 2 year degree. The internet is too ambigious to look up what career I want. I want a sound career and sociologically and economically most of us end up in careers working for small buisnesses that get wipped out by larger firms (think walmart, mcdonalds.... then in computers , everything we have 7-8 automotive companies , In computers 7-8 alternatives. Im speaking in general, but id rather not work for a small firm or if I do a rather secure or high paying job. Afterall ... many work for small companies, but the pay does not compensate such layoff risk! What type of degree in the forseable future will be in just a general demand that if one firm does close i can job hop, and such an industry as criteria wont face eventual elimination (at least for 20 years) in the future? Im frustrated because im honestly smarter than to just get a degree, with monsterous debt, with no pay off. Which job gets a good share of the economy's resources in this service economy? I am not stopping with 2 year degree. Looking at 4 year then working then a masters. Looking for a job that lands me in a institution or working for high reward if its a small profile company. and I am in college looking at what degree direction to go to. I like and can work with math and science, good with computers but have not taken computer courses. just want to understand all of this better. It seems like all they hype in universities is professional jobs; doctor, lawyer ... etc. And the internet is too ambigious when using search engines.